Single-cell data at scale
Where do batch effects actually come from?
The most manual step in the lab1 / 8
Label-free, scripted prep for million-cell datasets, on the robot you already run.
Virtual cell models, perturbation atlases and foundation-scale datasets are built from thousands of samples over months: cell lines after transfection or editing, PBMCs and dissociated tissue out of the freezer, iPSC-derived cells after differentiation, organoids after dissociation. Every one arrives with dead cells and debris, and if every one is cleaned up by hand, the dataset carries biases from the operator, the day and the centrifuge. The LeviCell 96 System replaces spins, filters, beads and labels with a gentle magnetic density field, scripted on your liquid handler, so every well gets the same treatment and leaves a QC record behind.
One SALT array: 96 wells, 15,000 to 500,000 cells each, 5 minutes hands-on, 45 minutes from loading to enriched cells.
Downstream software can regress out a batch effect it can measure. It cannot recover a sample that was never viable, and it cannot see the variability that manual prep adds before the first barcode.
Spins, strainers and bead kits are hands-on steps with hands-on variance. Across a hundred-million-cell program, that variance is a feature the model will learn.
Thaw, electroporation, lipofection, CRISPR editing, drug treatment and dissociation all leave dead and dying cells behind. Their RNA becomes ambient background in every barcode; their fragments become doublets and debris.
Most prep steps leave no record. When a cluster looks odd eighteen months later, nobody can say what the input looked like that day.
Levitation separates cells by their physical properties, so it does not care how the damage happened. It belongs wherever cells have just been thawed, transfected, edited, treated or dissociated, and right before they are fixed, barcoded or loaded.
Half the cells can be dead at thaw, and the debris is in the tube with them. Enrich live cells at thaw instead of waiting for a recovery culture that adds time and variance.
Measured on cryopreserved tumor DTCs: viability 52% → 75%; sequencing-ready samples from 1 in 16 → 10 in 16.Electroporation and lipofection kill a large share of cells in the first days, and the dying cells and fragments are still there when you harvest. Remove them label-free, right before fixation or barcoding, with no spins on fragile cells.
Timing: enrich at harvest, not after a recovery step that selects for the fittest clones.Dead cells and debris inflate ambient RNA and doublets, and both corrupt guide assignment and perturbation calls. Clean input makes the perturbation the only variable that changed.
Measured: 21% less ambient RNA and six-fold fewer doublets after one run, lower in every cell population.Cytotoxic conditions produce apoptotic fractions by design. Enrich the surviving cells so their transcriptomes describe the response, or collect defined fractions when death is the readout.
Label-free, so no antibody or dye biases which cells are kept.Differentiated cells and dissociated organoids are fragile and carry dissociation debris. A passive magnetic field, with no shear, centrifugation or filtering, keeps them intact and their transient states unchanged.
Cells, nuclei, organoids and spheroids; fresh, thawed or fixed.Nuclei preps carry cytoplasmic debris and clumps that read as background in every barcode. Clean up the nuclei suspension on the same array: debris and aggregates removed, nuclei collected ready to load.
Label-free clean-up of nuclei preps; no spins, no filters.The study figures above are from cryopreserved dissociated tumor cells, the hardest common input. The separation is physical and label-free, so the same step applies to any suspension; the 96-sample standardization run measures it on your cell type.
Where batch effects come from, why software can't fix them after the fact, and what a scripted, label-free prep step does about it. Eight slides; they advance on their own, or tap through.
Every one of these is a hands-on step with hands-on variance. Across a hundred-million-cell program, that variance is in the training set, and the model will learn it as biology.
Their RNA leaks into every cell's barcode as ambient RNA. Their fragments become doublets and debris. In the Discovery Life Sciences study, the most contaminated tumor sample spent 68% of its reads on soup, not cells.
You cannot recover a sample that was never viable, and you cannot see the variance that entered before the first barcode. The fix has to be physical, and it has to be the same every time.
A scripted protocol does the same thing to every well and leaves a run log behind. Pair it with viability counts before and after, and every sample in the dataset comes with a record of how it was prepared, and an answer when a cluster looks odd eighteen months later.
Building a perturbation atlas, a virtual cell training set or a screening program in the thousands of samples? We'll map the LeviCell 96 onto your robot. One page back, fifteen minutes, free.
The LeviCell 96 System brings the steps that usually happen on separate benches into one label-free, centrifuge-free workflow on standard SBS-compatible liquid handling.
Live cells levitate into one band; dead cells and debris sink. No labels, beads or shear.
Buffer exchanges in the well, with no centrifuge spins.
Pick the fraction of interest, combine wells to fit the study design, elute in small volumes ready for loading.
Identical, scripted processing in every well removes operator-to-operator and day-to-day variability before it reaches the data.
Label-free separation preserves native biology and removes dead cells and debris, the two largest sources of ambient RNA and doublets.
A scripted protocol does the same thing to every well and leaves a run log behind. Add viability counts before and after, as in the Discovery study, and every sample's prep is on record.
Cells, nuclei, organoids and spheroids, and particles. Fresh, thawed and fixed-cell workflows. Same chemistry from the LeviCell 12 to the LeviCell 96, so methods developed at small scale transfer without re-optimizing. The LeviCell 96 System ships with the INTEGRA liquid handler; the SALT array uses the SLAS/SBS 96-well footprint.
Discovery Life Sciences ran 16 cryopreserved dissociated tumor samples, the input most likely to arrive half dead, through one levitation step, then sequenced ten of them with the Parse Evercode WT assay, untouched and levitated.
110of 16
Median viability 52% to 75%; 89% of dead cells removed from a typical sample; 21% less ambient RNA and six times fewer doublets in the paired libraries; 85 of 100 marker genes carried over, so the biology came through unchanged. Ten times the datasets from the same tissue.
Full results, charts and cost model
"We successfully integrated LevitasBio's Levitation Technology into our workflows for a variety of single cell approaches. Experiments with very sensitive cell types, or samples that are not suitable for cell sorting, benefit from this gentle, fast method to exclude dead cells and debris."
Stefan Günther, PhDHead of Next Gen Sequencing Facility, Max Planck Institute"The LeviCell EOS system allows our lab to process several low-viability samples simultaneously into high-viability samples, which is absolutely critical for single cell sequencing analyses."
Greg Golden, PhDPostdoctoral Researcher, University of PennsylvaniaThe Discovery study is 16 samples at bench scale and 10 at sequencing scale, with a confirmatory same-run study in progress. Batch-effect reduction across a multi-month program is the expected consequence of identical, scripted processing; it is what the 96-sample standardization run below is designed to measure on your samples, not something we ask you to take on faith.
Pick the rung that matches where your program is. Each one produces something you can put in front of your team.
Tell us your liquid handler, sample types and throughput target. We send back a one-page map of the SALT array on your robot, with timing per plate and the protocols that apply. Free, no instrument required.
Request a liquid handler reviewSend 96 samples to us, or run them at a partner service lab. You get viability and debris counts for every sample before and after, as in the Discovery study, and a side-by-side against your current prep on the same material.
Plan a runDevelop methods on a LeviCell 12, then move to the LeviCell 96 System without re-optimizing. Flexible purchase options, so scaling up is a schedule decision, not a budget cliff.
Talk to an automation specialistAn illustrative model you can run on your own numbers. It uses this study's viability gain and your costs; replace any input with your own quotes.
0
| To reach the target | Current clean-up | With LeviCell 96 |
|---|---|---|
| Samples to prep and sequence | 0 | 0 |
| Usable cells per sample | 0 | 0 |
| Clean-up cost | $0 | $0 |
| Downstream cost | $0 | $0 |
| Total | $0 | $0 |
| Cost per usable cell | $0 | $0 |
Book a liquid handler review, plan a 96-sample run, get your cost model or just ask a question. One short form goes straight to the LevitasBio sales team.
Only your name, email and organization are required. Details about your robot and samples help us come back with something specific.
Prefer email? Write to sales@levitasbio.com.
Sharing this with your team? Download the one-pager (PDF).
If you're building a perturbation atlas, a virtual cell training set or a screening program that runs into the thousands of samples, we'd like to map LeviCell 96 onto your robot. It takes fifteen minutes and costs nothing.